Legal vs. Safety

June 14 2021
By: Terry L. Mathis

A recent client showed me how their legal department had re-written their safety procedures. While I am sure they would be more likely to stand up in court, absolutely none of the workers who had to use them had any idea what they said. In a litigious society like ours it is natural for corporate legal professionals to desire an airtight document in case of it being challenged post-accident. However, the primary function of any procedure is to instruct workers as to how to control the dangers inherent in a particular task. If the workers can't understand the procedure, it won't be used. Legal vs. Safety

There is a delicate balance between meeting the needs of both legal and safety, but that balance is critical to success. Neither department should write procedures without the participation or input of the other and all such documents should be a compromise between legal coverage and safety practicality. This may necessitate new organizational structure, but it is critical for achieving excellence for both endeavors.






Terry L. Mathis

Terry Mathis, Founder and retired CEO of ProAct Safety, has served as a consultant and advisor for top organizations the world over. A respected strategist and thought leader, Terry has authored five books, numerous articles, videos and blogs, and is known for his dynamic and engaging presentations. EHS Today has named him one of the '50 People Who Most Influenced EHS' four consecutive times. Business leaders and safety professionals seek Terry's practical insight and unique ability to introduce new perspectives that lead to real change.